Writers logo

I Published 157 Articles on Medium.

Here’s What Actually Changed Not just money, but how writing started to work differently

By abualyaanartPublished about 5 hours ago 2 min read

There’s something specific about crossing 100+ articles on Medium.

At 10 articles, you’re experimenting.

At 50, you’re still inconsistent.

But somewhere around 150+, patterns start becoming impossible to ignore.

After publishing 157 articles, the biggest realization wasn’t about earnings.

It was about how the system really works—and how most people misread it.

The Early Phase (0–30 Articles): Effort Without Feedback

The first batch of articles felt like shouting into an empty room.

Low views

Almost no engagement

No clear signal of what’s working

At this stage, it’s easy to overthink:

Headlines

Formatting

SEO

But none of it matters much without distribution.

What I didn’t understand then:

Medium doesn’t reward effort early. It rewards signals—and you don’t have any yet.

The Middle Phase (30–100 Articles): Random Wins

This is where things get confusing.

Some articles suddenly:

Get traction

Bring in followers

Perform better than expected

But the pattern isn’t clear.

You might think:

“This topic works”

Or “this writing style is the key”

But then the next similar article flops.

What’s actually happening:

The algorithm is testing your content

Different audiences are discovering you

You’re still building consistency signals

This phase creates false confidence—or frustration.

The Turning Point (100–157 Articles): Patterns Become Visible

After 100+ articles, the randomness starts fading.

Not completely—but enough to notice:

1. Certain topics consistently perform better

Not necessarily trending topics—but topics where:

You have clarity

You offer practical value

Readers stay longer

2. Writing becomes faster—and sharper

You stop:

Over-editing

Overthinking structure

And start focusing on:

Clarity

Flow

Real usefulness

3. Distribution improves slightly—but noticeably

Not viral-level—but:

More consistent views

More returning readers

The Numbers (What 157 Articles Really Produced)

Let’s be direct.

After publishing 157 articles:

A few posts performed well

Most performed average

Some did almost nothing

Income?

Modest—especially from Medium itself.

Because:

Output alone doesn’t guarantee income. Leverage does.

What Actually Started Working

After enough volume, a few things became clear.

1. One good article can outperform 20 average ones

But you can’t predict which one.

So the only strategy that works:

Keep publishing.

2. External monetization matters more than Medium payouts

Real income came from:

Affiliate links

Occasional sponsorships

People discovering services

Not from the platform alone.

3. Audience trust compounds slowly

Readers don’t convert on the first article.

But after multiple touchpoints:

They follow

They return

Some take action

This only happens with volume.

The Hidden Advantage of Writing 157 Articles

It’s not the content.

It’s the transformation.

You start to:

Think more clearly

Write faster

Spot weak ideas early

Understand what people actually care about

This is difficult to measure—but extremely valuable.

What Most People Get Wrong

They expect results too early.

After:

5 articles → no traction

20 articles → still inconsistent

50 articles → frustration

So they stop.

But 157 articles reveals something different:

The system only starts making sense after you stay in it long enough.

If I Had to Start Again

I wouldn’t aim for perfection.

I’d aim for:

Consistency

Volume with intent

Clear value in every article

And most importantly:

I’d treat Medium as a distribution channel, not the final destination.

Final Thought

157 articles didn’t make me rich.

But they did something more useful:

They removed guesswork.

And once guesswork is gone, progress becomes predictable.

AchievementsAdviceGuidesInspirationPublishingChallenge

About the Creator

abualyaanart

I write thoughtful, experience-driven stories about technology, digital life, and how modern tools quietly shape the way we think, work, and live.

I believe good technology should support life

Abualyaanart

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.